
SOW vs Invoice vs Commercial Proposal: What Legal Value?
Between SOW, invoice and commercial proposal, the legal distinctions are often poorly understood. Discover which ones truly bind the parties and from what threshold.
Last updated
Is an electronic signature valid and enforceable? Yes — and its probative force depends on the signature level. Here's what eIDAS and the Civil Code say, the probative force of each level and admissibility before courts.
Yes. Article 25 of the eIDAS regulation establishes a principle of non-discrimination: an electronic signature cannot be refused any legal effect or admissibility as evidence solely because it is in electronic form. Under French law, Article 1366 of the Civil Code gives electronic documents the same probative force as paper, subject to reliable identification of the author and conservation guaranteeing integrity.
Article 1367 of the Civil Code specifies that electronic signature consists of the use of a reliable identification process guaranteeing its link to the act. The reliability of this process is presumed when it meets the requirements set by decree — which corresponds to qualified signature (QES).
eIDAS defines three levels, whose probative force differs:
Admissible as evidence (art. 25 eIDAS) but without presumption: its value is freely assessed by the judge. Suitable for low-stakes documents.
Linked to the signatory, with authentication and audit trail. Its probative force is significantly strengthened; it is the recommended standard for most contracts.
Legal equivalent of handwritten signature (art. 25 eIDAS). It benefits from the presumption of reliability of Article 1367 of the Civil Code: the burden of proof is reversed in case of dispute.
In practice, several principles govern the use of electronic signature as evidence:
To maximize probative force, choose the level appropriate to the stakes (AES for most contracts, QES for the most sensitive acts) and systematically preserve the evidence file. With Certyneo, each signature comes with authentication, timestamping and a complete audit trail.
The signed document and its eIDAS evidence file are archived with probative value. In case of dispute, you have objective evidence (identity, integrity, date) that supports admissibility and the strength of proof.
Yes. It cannot be denied legal effect or admissibility as evidence on the ground that it is electronic (art. 25 eIDAS), and electronic writing has the same probative force as paper under conditions (art. 1366 Civil Code).
Qualified signature (QES): it is the legal equivalent of a handwritten signature and benefits from a presumption of reliability (art. 1367 Civil Code). Advanced signature (AES) remains very solid for most uses.
Yes, it is admissible as evidence. For SES and AES, its value is assessed in light of the reliability of the process (audit trail, time stamp); for QES, a presumption of reliability applies.
For qualified signature (QES), the presumption operates in favour of the party relying on it. For SES and AES, it is up to them to demonstrate reliability — hence the importance of the eIDAS evidence file provided by Certyneo.
Find the infographics and visual summaries from this guide on our Pinterest boards, to pin or keep at hand.
SES, AES, QES: the three levels of signature and the European framework.
Read the guideDefinition, how it works and implementation: the complete guide.
Read the guideWhy a scanned signature is weak and which alternative to choose.
Read the guideWe use cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies strictly necessary for the service to function are always active. Learn more about our cookie policy

Between SOW, invoice and commercial proposal, the legal distinctions are often poorly understood. Discover which ones truly bind the parties and from what threshold.

Does an electronic signature really have the same legal force as a handwritten signature? Discover the precise rules that apply in France in 2026.