Average reduction in contract timescales observed after adoption
Source: Industry benchmark (Forrester, DocuSign, Markess 2023–2025)
Range observed: 40% to 80% depending on size and processes.
A comprehensive overview of the French and European market: eIDAS 2.0 regulatory framework, EUDI wallet deployment, adoption rates by sector, persistent barriers and outlook for 2026–2027. An essential reference document for executives, legal professionals, CIOs and operational teams managing contract digitalisation.
The year 2026 marks a turning point for electronic signature in Europe. After more than twenty-five years of legal recognition in France (law of 13 March 2000, Article 1367 of the Civil Code), digitalisation of contracts has reached unprecedented maturity: virtually all large enterprises use at least one signature tool, and advanced signature (AES) has become the norm for high-stakes commercial contracts.
Yet this year is not like any other. Three major movements are converging. First, the application of eIDAS 2.0 regulation, adopted in 2024, which introduces the European digital identity wallet (EUDI Wallet) and redefines the conditions for qualified signature (QES). Second, the democratisation of QES, which slowly emerges from the sphere of notaries and public procurement to become accessible to all enterprises through mutualised qualified trust service providers. Finally, the emergence of AI in the contractual chain — from clause drafting to post-signature verification — which reconfigures uses and calls for new vigilance on personal data protection.
For enterprises, the benefits remain substantial: contract timescales reduced by an average of 60% (industry benchmark), savings on printing and postal delivery, a more robust digital audit trail than paper, GDPR compliance when the platform is hosted in the EU. Yet barriers persist — perception of legal risk, UX complexity for external signatories, hosting sovereignty — which this report documents honestly.
This document addresses decision-makers arbitrating a rollout, legal experts securing processes, CIOs integrating signature into their IT systems, and operational teams (sales, HR, legal, procurement) using signature daily. It is freely reproducible provided the source is cited — the source is indicated for each figure. Figures explicitly qualified as "estimates" are based on observation of Certyneo platform usage and cross-referencing of available public benchmarks.
We address in turn the market's key figures, the evolution of the regulatory framework, sectoral adoption dynamics, trends over the next 18–24 months, persistent barriers, criteria for choosing a solution, Certyneo's positioning, and our outlook for 2027.
Each figure below is attributed to its source. Ranges and percentages are orders of magnitude; precise values may vary substantially depending on enterprise size, sectors and methodologies.
Average reduction in contract timescales observed after adoption
Source: Industry benchmark (Forrester, DocuSign, Markess 2023–2025)
Range observed: 40% to 80% depending on size and processes.
Average cost of a paper contract (printing, delivery, archival)
Source: Markess — digitalisation observatory 2025
Varies depending on the number of signatories, complexity and validation workflows.
Annual growth of the European electronic signature market
Source: Consolidated estimate Statista / Gartner 2024
Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) estimated over the period 2023–2028.
EU Member States covered by the eIDAS Regulation
Source: Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and eIDAS 2.0 revision (2024)
SES, AES, QES — the three eIDAS levels
Source: eIDAS Regulation, Articles 25 to 34
Minimum legal archival period with evidential value recommended in France
Source: Article 2224 of the Civil Code — commercial limitation period
Actual period often extended to 30 years for long-term execution contracts.
Adopted in April 2024 and entering into force that same year, eIDAS 2.0 regulation (regulation (EU) 2024/1183) profoundly modifies regulation (EU) 910/2014. It retains the three historic levels — simple electronic signature (SES), advanced (AES), qualified (QES) — but introduces the European digital identity wallet (European Digital Identity Wallet, known as EUDI Wallet). Each Member State must offer its citizens, from 2026 onwards, a compliant wallet enabling identification and QES-level signing.
Concretely, the wallet takes the form of a certified mobile application, which contains the citizen's digital identity, their verified attributes (qualifications, driving licences, professional cards) and native QES signing capacity. It operates on the OpenID for Verifiable Credentials standard. For businesses, this means that from 2026-2027 onwards, a signer will be able to sign a contract at QES level without purchasing an individual certificate or acquiring specific equipment — their smartphone is sufficient.
In France, ANSSI publishes the requirement frameworks applicable to trust service providers (PSCO, PSCE) and issues qualifications. The main frameworks — RGS, PVID, First-level security certification — align with European ETSI standards (EN 319 401, EN 319 411, EN 319 421). The SecNumCloud label, required by the "Cloud at the centre" doctrine, conditions the use of cloud platforms for administrations and OIV (vital importance operators).
At the national level, Article 1367 of the Civil Code — introduced by the law of 13 March 2000 and amended by the ordinance of 10 February 2016 — recognises electronic signature as having the same value as handwritten signature, provided the signatory is reliably identified and the document's integrity is ensured. Decree No. 2017-1416 of 28 September 2017 specifies the conditions for the presumption of reliability reserved for QES. Article 1366 of the Civil Code, for its part, admits electronic writing as evidence.
Cross-qualitative analysis: Markess / Forrester benchmarks, observation of our client base and dialogue with decision-makers. Dynamics vary significantly from sector to sector; the global "average" adoption masks substantial variations.
Use cases: Mandates, agreements in principle, commercial leases, property inspections, amendments.
Adoption: Massive adoption since 2020: the majority of agencies use at least one signature tool. AES preferred for leases; QES requested by certain notaries.
Use cases: Employment contracts, amendments, termination agreements, associated DPAE.
Adoption: Historically pioneering sector. AES signature predominant with SMS OTP; HRIS integrations (HubSpot, BambooHR, Lucca) now standard.
Use cases: Product subscriptions, management mandates, amendments, powers of attorney.
Adoption: Strong regulatory pressure (ACPR, KYC): AES or QES systematic depending on the product. Highly industrialised processes.
Use cases: NDAs, settlement agreements, mandates, fee agreements.
Adoption: Adoption progressing. Law firms prefer AES for private acts; QES remains confidential outside notarial acts.
Use cases: Consents, cooperation agreements, supplier contracts.
Adoption: Slower adoption, strong HDS and CNIL constraints. Accelerating for supplier contracts and telemedicine.
Use cases: Public procurement, deliberations, subsidy agreements.
Adoption: QES mandated by public procurement code for contracts; FranceConnect+ and the future EUDI Wallet accelerate usage.
Six major movements will structure the market over the next eighteen months.
Current schedule: progressive rollout by Member States from 2026 onwards. It will enable each citizen to sign at QES level via their smartphone, with a high eIDAS identity level.
QES, long reserved for notaries and public procurement, becomes accessible via pooled QTSPs and future identity wallets. Entry barrier (cost, UX) falling sharply.
Automatic clause analysis, key date extraction, risk detection: AI enters the loop upstream of signature. Vigilance is required on personal data processing and accountability.
E-signature platforms converge towards REST APIs, webhooks and native connectors (Zapier, Make, HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack). Integration costs for an SME are collapsing.
European buyers — particularly public and regulated ones — increasingly demand EU hosting, GDPR-by-design compliance and independence from the American Cloud Act.
More than half of signatures are now completed on smartphone. Desktop-first UX designs are losing ground; device biometrics (FaceID, fingerprint) become standard as additional authentication.
To learn more about market developments: Electronic signature trends in 2025
An honest report cannot simply celebrate successes. Here are the obstacles we observe most frequently — including among prospects who end up abandoning digitalisation.
Despite twenty-five years of legal recognition (law of 13 March 2000, Article 1367 of the Civil Code, eIDAS regulation), some legal departments retain suspicion towards SES. The reflex "handwritten signature = safer" persists, even though electronic audit trail is objectively more robust than ink.
Chief Information Security Officers rightfully demand guarantees on hosting, encryption, evidence retention, and data portability. Platforms that do not publicly document their architecture or depend on extra-European cloud infrastructure are immediately disqualified from sensitive tender processes.
External signatories — clients, partners, candidates — are not intended to create an account. Platforms that require registration, application download, or a journey exceeding three screens cause completion rates to drop significantly.
Beyond the advertised price per signature, the actual cost includes licences, SMS OTP volumes, bespoke integrations, and long-term archiving. Opaque pricing structures slow down decision-making, particularly for SMEs.
Without a clear signature policy (who can sign what, with what eIDAS level, with what approval workflow), rollout remains anecdotal. The barrier is as much cultural and organisational as technical.
Six criteria are sufficient to disqualify the majority of offerings and converge towards an informed choice. We recommend adopting them exactly as stated in your specifications document.
Require the precise list of supported levels (SES, AES, QES), identification of the trust service provider (or partner QTSP), and publication of the audit trail included in each signed document.
France or European Union preferred, with contractual commitment to no extra-EU data transfer. Verify the hosting provider (OVH, Scaleway, AWS EU with explicit EU region), ISO 27001 certification, and HDS for healthcare.
Standard webhooks (envelope.sent, envelope.signed, envelope.declined), documented REST API (OpenAPI), connectors for Zapier / Make / HubSpot / Salesforce / Slack. Without integrations, signature remains a silo.
Favour fixed-price plans per user or per envelope, with clear included thresholds. Beware of hidden surcharges (SMS OTP, long-term archiving, exports).
Test the accountless journey: average signing time, mobile accessibility, clarity of instructions, refusal handling. A good indicator: fewer than 3 clicks for an already-identified signatory.
French, English, Spanish, German, Italian at minimum if your activity is European. Localisation of emails and the signatory interface is key to completion rates.
In the interest of transparency—since this report is published by Certyneo—we clarify here what we offer, what we do not yet offer, and what sets us apart.
Electronic signature has reached the threshold of routine adoption. In 2026, it is present in virtually all major French enterprises, rapidly gaining ground among SMEs, and establishing itself durably in the public sector thanks to digitalisation of procurement. The figures confirm this: the market is growing at double-digit rates, costs are declining, and integrations are standardising.
Three priorities emerge for the next eighteen months. First, anticipate the arrival of the EUDI wallet: enterprises equipping themselves today with an eIDAS-compliant and extensible solution will not suffer costly migration when QES becomes widespread. Second, consolidate internal governance: a clear signature policy, broken down by contract type and stakes level, remains the main success factor — more so than the choice of tool itself. Finally, integrate signature into business processes rather than extracting it from them: value is created in workflows (CRM, HRIS, procurement, legal), not in the isolated platform.
By 2027, we anticipate three shifts: QES will become predominant on high-stakes contracts; AI will be natively integrated into contract review, subject to specific regulatory oversight (AI Act); and European sovereignty—EU hosting, independence from the Cloud Act—will become a discriminating purchase criterion in most B2B tenders.
Electronic signature is no longer an IT project. It has become a contractual infrastructure. Organisations that treat it as such—with the rigour, governance, and permanence accorded to infrastructure—derive the greatest benefit from it.
Leave your email address to receive the PDF and monthly updates (2 emails/month maximum) on electronic signature, eIDAS regulation and market developments. Unsubscribe with one click.
GDPR Compliance: your data is processed by Certyneo (EU hosting). See our privacy policy.
This report is published under an open licence (citation required, no full reproduction without permission). For any citation, interview, or press inquiry, contact our press team.
Try Certyneo free with 5 envelopes per month. eIDAS compliant, hosted in Germany (EU), audit trail included.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies strictly necessary for the service to function are always active. Learn more