An overview of the French and European market: the eIDAS 2.0 regulatory framework, the rollout of the EUDI wallet, usage by sector, persistent barriers and the outlook for 2026-2027. A reference document for executives, lawyers, CIOs and operational teams driving the digitization of their contracts.
2026 marks a turning point for electronic signatures in Europe. After more than twenty-five years of legal recognition in France (Act of 13 March 2000, article 1367 of the Civil Code), digital contracts have become everyday practice, and the advanced electronic signature (AES) has become the norm for high-stakes commercial contracts.
Yet this year is not like any other. Three major developments come together. First, the application of eIDAS 2.0 regulation, adopted in 2024, which introduces the European digital identity wallet (EUDI Wallet) and redefines the conditions for qualified signature (QES). Next, the democratization of QES, which is slowly moving beyond the notarial and public procurement sphere to become accessible to all companies via shared trust service providers. Finally, the emergence of AI in the contract chain — from clause drafting to post-signature verification — which reconfigures usage and calls for renewed vigilance on personal data protection.
For businesses, the benefits are tangible: on the Certyneo platform, half of all remote signatures arrive within 35 minutes of sending, whereas a registered letter with proof of delivery costs €7.56 at La Poste's public price, before printing and delivery time. Add to this a digital evidence file that is more robust than paper and GDPR compliance when the platform is hosted in the EU. Barriers remain, however (perceived legal risk, complexity for external signers, hosting sovereignty), and this report documents them honestly.
This document is aimed at executives deciding on a rollout, lawyers securing processes, CIOs integrating signatures into their information systems, and operational teams (sales, HR, legal, purchasing) who sign documents every day. It may be freely reproduced provided it is credited. Every figure is either taken from a cited public source or measured on the Certyneo platform with its base and period; none is estimated.
We cover in turn the key market figures, regulatory framework evolution, sectoral adoption dynamics, 18–24 month trends, persistent barriers, solution selection criteria, Certyneo's positioning, and our outlook for 2027.
Every figure below is either taken from a legal text or public price list, or measured on the Certyneo platform with its base and period. None is an estimate.
Median time between sending a signature request and the signature
Source: Certyneo 2026 Barometer, measured on 388 remote signatures (invitations sent from 17 April to 26 September 2026)
A quarter of signatures arrive in under 4 minutes, another quarter after more than 15 hours.
Price of a registered letter with proof of delivery (20 g)
Source: La Poste, prices from 1 January 2026: R1 registered letter €6.11 + proof of delivery €1.45
Excluding printing, envelope, preparation time and paper archiving.
Share of remote signatures made on a smartphone
Source: Certyneo 2026 Barometer, 163 signatures out of 388
Median time on a smartphone: 27 minutes, against 49 minutes on a computer.
EU member states covered by the eIDAS regulation
Source: Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 and eIDAS 2.0 revision (2024)
SES, AES, QES — the three eIDAS levels
Source: eIDAS Regulation, Articles 25–34
Retention period for a contract concluded online with a consumer, from €120
Source: French Consumer Code, articles L213-1, D213-1 and D213-2
Not to be confused with the general limitation period of 5 years (article 2224 of the French Civil Code).
Adopted in April 2024 and in force the same year, the eIDAS 2.0 regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183) substantially amends Regulation (EU) 910/2014. It keeps the three historical levels — simple (SES), advanced (AES) and qualified (QES) electronic signatures — but introduces the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet). Every member state must offer its citizens, by 24 December 2026 at the latest, a compliant wallet for identifying themselves and signing at QES level.
In practice, the wallet takes the form of a certified mobile application that contains the citizen's digital identity, verified credentials (diplomas, licenses, professional cards), and native QES signing capability. It operates on the OpenID for Verifiable Credentials standard. For businesses, this means that starting in 2026-2027, a signer will be able to sign a contract at the QES level without purchasing an individual certificate or acquiring specialized equipment — their smartphone is sufficient.
In France, ANSSI publishes requirement frameworks applicable to trust service providers (PSCO, PSCE) and issues qualifications. The principal frameworks — RGS, PVID, First-Level Security Certification — articulate with European ETSI standards (EN 319 401, EN 319 411, EN 319 421). The SecNumCloud label, required by the "Cloud at the Center" doctrine, conditions the use of cloud platforms for public administrations and critical infrastructure operators (OIV).
At the national level, Article 1367 of the Civil Code — introduced by the law of March 13, 2000 and amended by the ordinance of February 10, 2016 — recognizes electronic signature as having the same value as handwritten signature, subject to reliable identification of the signatory and document integrity. Decree No. 2017-1416 of September 28, 2017 clarifies the conditions for the presumption of reliability reserved for QES. Article 1366 of the Civil Code, for its part, admits electronic documents as evidence.
A qualitative reading, without figures: which documents each sector signs electronically and at which eIDAS level. No representative source measures adoption by sector in France, so we publish no rates.
Use cases: Mandates, purchase agreements, commercial leases, inspection reports, amendments.
Practices: Common for mandates and leases. AES preferred for leases; the final deed of sale is still executed before a notary.
Use cases: Employment contracts, amendments, severance agreements, associated labor filings.
Practices: AES with a one-time SMS code is common for employment contracts; integrations with HR information systems are becoming widespread.
Use cases: Product subscriptions, management mandates, amendments, powers of attorney.
Practices: Know-your-customer (KYC) requirements supervised by the ACPR: AES or QES depending on the product. Highly industrialized processes.
Use cases: NDAs, settlement agreements, mandates, fee agreements.
Practices: Law firms favor AES for private agreements; QES remains rare outside notarial deeds.
Use cases: Consents, cooperation agreements, vendor contracts.
Practices: Strict requirements for health data hosting (HDS) and from the CNIL; used mainly for supplier contracts and agreements.
Use cases: Public procurement, resolutions, subsidy agreements.
Practices: When a public procurement contract is signed electronically, the order of 22 March 2019 requires at least an advanced signature based on a qualified certificate. FranceConnect+ and the upcoming EUDI wallet make identification easier.
Six major forces will shape the market over the next eighteen months.
Every member state must offer at least one wallet by 24 December 2026 at the latest (Regulation 2024/1183, art. 5a). It will let every citizen sign at QES level from their smartphone, with a high eIDAS identity assurance level.
QES, long confined to notaries and public procurement, becomes accessible through pooled QTSPs and emerging identity wallets. Barriers to entry (cost, UX) are dropping sharply.
Automated clause analysis, key date extraction, risk detection: AI enters the loop upstream of signing. Care must be taken regarding personal data processing and liability.
E-signature platforms are converging toward REST APIs, webhooks, and native connectors (Zapier, Make, HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack). Integration costs for SMEs are plummeting.
European buyers — notably public and regulated entities — increasingly demand EU hosting, GDPR-by-design compliance, and independence from the US Cloud Act.
On the Certyneo platform, 42 % of remote signatures are made on a smartphone, where people sign faster than on a computer (median of 27 minutes against 49). A flow designed for the computer first penalises those signers.
To explore market trends further: Electronic Signature Trends in 2025
An honest report cannot simply celebrate successes. Here are the obstacles we observe most frequently — including among prospects who ultimately abandon digitalization.
Despite twenty-five years of legal recognition (law of March 13, 2000, Article 1367 of the Civil Code, eIDAS regulation), some legal departments maintain distrust of SES. The "handwritten signature = safer" reflex persists, even though the electronic audit trail is objectively more robust than ink.
IT Directors rightfully demand guarantees on hosting, encryption, evidence retention, and data portability. Platforms that do not publicly document their architecture or depend on extra-European cloud are disqualified outright on sensitive tenders.
External signers — customers, partners, candidates — are not expected to create an account. Platforms that require registration, app download, or journeys longer than three screens cause completion rates to drop.
Beyond the per-signature price, real cost includes licenses, SMS OTP volumes, custom integrations, and long-term archiving. Opaque pricing grids slow decision-making, especially for SMEs.
Without a clear signing policy (who can sign what, at which eIDAS level, with which approval workflow), deployment remains marginal. The obstacle is cultural and organizational as much as technical.
Six criteria are enough to rule out the majority of offerings and converge on an informed choice. We recommend incorporating them as-is into your requirements specification.
Demand the precise list of supported levels (SES, AES, QES), identification of the trust service provider (or partner QTSP), and publication of the audit trail included in each signed document.
France or European Union preferably, with contractual commitment to no extra-EU transfer. Verify the hosting provider (OVH, Scaleway, AWS EU with explicit EU region), ISO 27001 certification, and HDS for healthcare.
Standard webhooks (`envelope.sent`, `recipient.signed`, `envelope.completed`), documented REST API (OpenAPI), Zapier / Make / HubSpot / Salesforce / Slack connectors. Without integrations, signing remains a silo.
Favor fixed-price plans per user or per envelope, with clear included thresholds. Beware of hidden surcharges (SMS OTP, long-term archiving, exports).
Test the account-free journey: average signing time, mobile accessibility, instruction clarity, refusal handling. A good indicator: fewer than 3 clicks for an already-identified signer.
French, English, Spanish, German, Italian at minimum if your activity is European. Localization of emails and signer interface is key to completion rates.
For transparency — since this report is published by Certyneo — we clarify here what we offer, what we do not offer, and what sets us apart.
Electronic signatures have become an ordinary contracting tool. On the Certyneo platform, half of all remote signatures arrive within 35 minutes and 42 % are made on a smartphone; the legal framework, for its part, has been stable since 2016 and is being extended by eIDAS 2.0. We put no figure on the size or growth of the market: no representative public source allows it.
Three priorities are emerging for the next eighteen months. First, anticipate the arrival of the EUDI wallet: companies that equip themselves today with an eIDAS-compliant and extensible solution will not suffer costly migration when QES becomes mainstream. Second, strengthen internal governance: a clear signing policy, tailored by contract type and stakes level, remains the primary success factor — more so than the choice of tool itself. Finally, integrate signing into business processes rather than extract it from them: value is created in workflows (CRM, HR, procurement, legal), not in an isolated platform.
Looking ahead to 2027, we put forward three hypotheses, which are opinions rather than measurements: QES will gain ground on high-stakes contracts as EUDI wallets become available; AI will be built into contract review, under specific regulation (AI Act); and European sovereignty — EU hosting, independence from the US Cloud Act — will weigh more heavily in B2B tenders.
Electronic signature is no longer an IT project. It has become a contractual infrastructure. Organizations that treat it as such — with the rigor, governance, and sustainability afforded to infrastructure — derive the greatest value from it.
Leave your email address to receive the PDF and monthly monitoring (2 emails / month maximum) on electronic signature, eIDAS regulation, and market developments. Unsubscribe in one click.
GDPR compliance: your data is processed by Certyneo (EU hosting). See our privacy policy.
This report is published under an open license (attribution required, no full reproduction without consent). For any citation, interview, or media inquiries, contact our press office.
Test Certyneo free with 5 envelopes for 14 days, then 2/mo. eIDAS-compliant, hosted (EU), audit trail included.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies strictly necessary for the service to function are always active. Learn more about our cookie policy